Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-03 dismissed

Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Mumbai vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

The Court decided whether bottling liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) into cylinders qualifies as 'production' or 'manufacture' under the Income Tax Act, 1961, to claim tax deductions. The Assessing Officer argued that since LPG's chemical composition doesn't change, bottling is not manufacture. The Court held that 'production' is wider than 'manufacture' and includes activities creating commercially distinct, marketable products. Bottling LPG involves complex processes (compression, liquefaction, safety mechanisms) rendering it usable for domestic consumers. This transformative process constitutes 'production', entitling the assessees to tax deductions under Sections 80HH, 80-I and 80-IA. The appeals were dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Deductions Manufacturing Activity Petroleum Products Definition of Manufacture Definition of Production

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login