Breaking Constructive Criticism Essential for Democracy, but School Curricula Must Remain Fair and Verified: Supreme Court
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-22 allowed

State of Karnataka vs M.K. Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Judge 1, Judge 2

In Brief

The State of Karnataka challenged a High Court judgment allowing M.K. Agro Tech full input tax credit on sunflower oil extraction. The assessee purchased sunflower cake (taxable), extracted oil (taxable), but also produced de-oiled cake as a by-product, which was exempted from VAT. The State sought partial rebate of input tax under Section 17 of the Karnataka VAT Act. The Supreme Court held that Section 17 applies whenever taxable and exempted goods are sold, regardless of whether the exempted good is a by-product. The Court rejected purposive construction, ruling that literal interpretation—focusing on 'sale' of 'goods'—properly governs VAT statutes. Since de-oiled cake was sold for 45% of total revenue, full input tax credit was denied; partial apportionment under Rule 131 applied. The State's appeal was allowed and the High Court judgment was set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Goods and Services Tax / VAT Input Tax Credit Exempted Goods By-products and Ancillary Products Interpretation of Taxing Statutes Statutory Construction – Literal vs. Purposive

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login