Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-05-04 partly_allowed

Commissioner of Income Tax 8 Mumbai vs Glowshine Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

In Brief

A company sold development rights in property for Rs. 15,94,06,500/- to Kirit City Homes in May 2008, later claiming the true consideration was Rs. 5,24,27,354/- through a rectification deed. The tax authority added the higher amount as capital gains; the company claimed it was stock-in-trade income already reported in the prior year. The ITAT allowed the company's appeal; the High Court upheld this. The Supreme Court held the ITAT failed to examine critical factors (frequency of sales, volume, transaction history) required to determine if this was sale of capital assets or stock-in-trade. Most importantly, the Court found the ITAT never verified whether the differential amount (Rs. 10,69,79,146/-) was actually refunded, noting that amounts received and recorded must be treated as income unless refunded. The matter was remitted to the ITAT for fresh consideration of all relevant factors.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Capital Assets vs Stock in Trade Assessment Procedure Section 50C Revenue Jurisdiction Tribunal Jurisdiction Appellate Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login