Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-05-11 allowed

Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai vs Amitabh Bachchan

Bench: 2 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

The Revenue (Income Tax Commissioner) challenged the High Court's order dismissing its revision of an assessment under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, Amitabh Bachchan, claimed additional expenses in a revised return but later withdrew the claim. The Supreme Court held that the Commissioner could exercise revisional powers on grounds beyond a show cause notice so long as the assessee received a genuine opportunity to be heard. The Court ruled that withdrawal of an expense claim does not preclude further investigation into whether expenses were actually incurred. The Commissioner's satisfaction that the assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue justified the revision order. The appeal was allowed and the Commissioner's revisional order was restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Revisional Jurisdiction Assessment Procedure Administrative Law Principles of Natural Justice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login