Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-03-08 dismissed

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Jyotsna Holdings (P) Ltd

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The assessee filed income tax returns and paid Rs. 3.23 crores; the assessment found Rs. 2.03 crores refundable. The Department retained and adjusted this amount against other year's demands instead of immediately refunding it. The assessee sought interest for the retention period. The lower authorities and High Court awarded interest under Section 244(1A) of the Income Tax Act. The Supreme Court upheld this, holding that when a refundable amount is kept and utilized by the Revenue, interest is payable even though the amount was ultimately refunded.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Refunds Interest on Refunds Tax Law Section 244(1A)

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login