Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-11-01 allowed

K. Lakshmanya & Company vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

A partnership firm filed returns for the assessment years 1993–94 and 1994–95. After assessment, interest under Sections 234(A)–(C) was levied. The assessee applied to the Settlement Commission to waive the interest claiming hardship, which the Commission partially granted. The assessee then claimed interest on the refund resulting from the waived interest under Section 244(A), but the Assessing Officer refused. The Supreme Court held that once the Settlement Commission exercises its discretionary power to waive interest, an assessee becomes entitled to interest on the resulting refund as a matter of law. The right to interest on refund is statutory and non-discretionary once refund is due, regardless of whether the waiver itself was discretionary.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Refund Interest on Refund Settlement Commission Tax Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login