Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-08 allowed

Devi Lal vs State of Rajasthan

Bench: 3 — Rastogi

In Brief

The appellants Babu Lal and Devi Lal were convicted of murder (Section 302) and conspiracy (Section 120B) in the killing of Dharam Chand in 1999. The Supreme Court reversed their convictions, finding that the prosecution's case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence that was incomplete and incoherent. Although suspicions existed—including financial disputes and recovery of physical items—the Court held that the chain of circumstances did not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The extra-judicial confession lacked corroboration, and Devi Lal's involvement was never properly explained. The Court emphasized that suspicion, however grave, cannot substitute proof. Both appellants were acquitted and released.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Circumstantial Evidence Conspiracy Murder Burden of Proof

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login