In Brief
This case concerned a murder and destruction of evidence case where the High Court had acquitted three accused (Mahesh Kumar and others) after finding the prosecution's circumstantial evidence doubtful, contradictory, and unreliable. The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal, affirming that in circumstantial evidence cases, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of events excluding all other hypotheses. The Court found that key witnesses were not produced, many prosecution witnesses were declared hostile, there were material contradictions in testimony, and crucial forensic evidence (blood marks in the auto-rickshaw) was missing. The prosecution failed to complete the chain of evidence necessary to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.