Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-06-29 disposed

Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs Arjunbhai Shankarbhai Rathod (Adivasi) and Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel sought special leave to appeal a High Court order that noted a prima facie case for criminal offences and atrocities under various IPC and Atrocities Act sections. The petitioner contended the High Court had issued binding directions for FIR registration under Article 226. The Supreme Court held that such observations are not Article 226 directions. The investigating agency must proceed independently in accordance with law, and if aggrieved, the petitioner may approach an appropriate court which shall decide independently, uninfluenced by the High Court's prior observations. The petition was disposed of.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure High Court Jurisdiction FIR Registration Judicial Remedy Atrocities Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login