Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-04-22 allowed

Essilor India Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Essilor India imported spectacle lenses and sought exemption from customs and excise duty under the 2006 exemption notification. The customs authority rejected the claim, treating the lenses as 'semi-finished' and therefore ineligible. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that these power lenses—which require customization per customer prescription but are otherwise complete optical products—qualify as finished spectacle lenses under the exemption notification. The 2005 shift from 6-digit to 8-digit tariff codes was merely technical and did not alter substantive duty treatment or exemption benefits. The appellant was entitled to the same exemption it had historically received.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Customs Law Excise Duty Tariff Classification Exemption Notifications Import Duties

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login