Breaking Constructive Criticism Essential for Democracy, but School Curricula Must Remain Fair and Verified: Supreme Court
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-06 partly_allowed

Executive Engineer (c), B.S.N.L., Haryana vs Satpal

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A driver employed by BSNL Haryana since 1991 was terminated in 2001 without following the mandatory procedures under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour courts directed reinstatement with 50% back wages, which the High Court upheld. The Supreme Court found that while the termination was procedurally invalid, the employee—now aged 68 with no prospect of re-employment—had already received Section 17-B wages. The Court awarded a final settlement of Rs 2.5 lakh in lieu of reinstatement, clarifying this was not a precedent but a case-specific discretionary remedy considering the employee's advanced age and circumstances.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour Law Industrial Disputes Reinstatement Compensation Termination of Service

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login