Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-24 allowed

Farooq vs Sandhya Anthraper Kurishingal & ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Two partners sued a third partner and their unregistered firm to cancel a property sale made without consent of all partners, citing a clause in the partnership deed. The trial court dismissed the suit as barred by Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, which prohibits suits by or on behalf of partners against a firm unless it is registered. The High Court reversed, holding the plaintiffs could sue as co-owners of property. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, restoring the trial court's order. The Court held that the plaint, read as a whole, was fundamentally based on partnership rights and the partnership deed, and therefore Section 69's bar applied despite an attempt to frame the claim as one between co-owners.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Partnership Law Indian Partnership Act Non-Registration Civil Procedure Maintainability of Suit

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login