Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-24 allowed

Farooq vs Sandhya Anthraper Kurishingal & ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Two partners of an unregistered firm sued another partner to cancel the sale of property purchased with firm funds, claiming he had no authority to sell without written consent of all partners under the Partnership Deed. The Trial Court barred the suit under Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which prevents unregistered firms from suing. The High Court reversed, holding the plaintiffs sued as co-owners, not as partners. The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's order, holding that the suit was fundamentally grounded in enforcing partnership rights under the Deed, not co-ownership, and therefore remained barred by Section 69 regardless of how the plaint was framed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Partnership Civil Procedure Maintainability of Suit Transfer of Property

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login