Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-14 partly_allowed

Gagan Kumar vs State of Punjab

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Gagan Kumar was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code (rash/negligent driving and death by negligence). He received two separate sentences: 2 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 304A and 6 months under Section 279, each with fines. The Supreme Court upheld both convictions but found that the Magistrate failed to comply with Section 31 of the CrPC, which mandates specification of whether multiple sentences run concurrently or consecutively. The Court corrected this omission, directing that both sentences run concurrently, thereby reducing effective imprisonment to 2 years.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Sentencing Multiple Offences Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login