Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-01-19 allowed

Gajanand Sharma vs Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti & Ors

Bench: 2 — M. R. Shah, C. T. Ravikumar

In Brief

An employee of a private school in Rajasthan was terminated following a departmental enquiry for misconduct. The employer argued that prior approval from the Director of Education was not needed because disciplinary proceedings had been conducted. The Supreme Court held that Section 18 of the Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989 mandates prior Director approval for all terminations, whether following enquiry or not. The Court rejected the High Court's refusal to follow the binding precedent in Raj Kumar v. Director of Education, noting that the High Court's claim that Raj Kumar ignored an earlier decision was factually wrong. The Court restored the Tribunal's order setting aside the termination and directed reinstatement with 50% back wages.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Educational Law Administrative Law Labor and Employment Law Statutory Interpretation Judicial Review Service Termination

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login