In Brief
The appellants sought to protect their interest in land by challenging a High Court judgment in a Second Appeal. The Supreme Court found that the High Court had not adequately addressed the substantial questions of law raised regarding partition of the land. Rather than finally deciding the matter, the Court remitted it to the High Court for reconsideration, noting that the High Court could further remit the case to the trial court if additional evidence was needed. The appeal was disposed of on these terms.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.