Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-20 allowed

Ghewarchand & Ors vs Mahendra Singh & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

The appellants filed a civil suit claiming declaration of title, injunction and possession of a property against the respondents. The trial court decreed the suit, holding the appellants owned the property and that the suit was filed within the limitation period. The high court upheld the trial court's factual findings but reversed the limitation decision, treating the suit as one for declaration and injunction only (three-year limitation) rather than one claiming possession. The Supreme Court held that since the plaint expressly prayed for possession, Article 65 of the Limitation Act (12-year period) applied, not the three-year period. The suit was filed within 12 years from when the defendants' adverse possession became known. The appeal was allowed and the trial court's judgment restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Limitation Law Property Law Possession and Title Remedies (Declaration and Injunction) Criminal Procedure Code

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login