Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-03-28 allowed

Mohinder Singh (Dead) through L.Rs vs Paramjit Singh & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

In this ancestral property dispute governed by the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920, the plaintiff obtained a declaratory decree in 1963 declaring a gift deed void, based on a compromise. The decree sheet was formally prepared in 1972, and the plaintiff then filed a suit for possession in 1974. The High Court dismissed the suit as time-barred, treating the limitation period as running from 1971 (when the condition for possession matured with a death). The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that 'declaratory decree is obtained' means the date the decree sheet is formally drawn (1972), not the judgment date (1963). Thus the 1974 suit fell within the three-year limitation period. Alternatively, even if computed from 1971, Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would exclude time spent pursuing prior execution proceedings in good faith.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Limitation of Suits Ancestral Property Custom Law Declaratory Decree Possession Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login