Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-04 disposed

Government of NCT of Delhi vs Union of India & Another

Bench: 5 — Dipak Misra, A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that the Council of Ministers of Delhi has executive power coextensive with the Delhi Legislative Assembly's legislative power. The Lieutenant Governor must act on the Council's 'aid and advice' in these matters, and decisions do not require his prior concurrence, only communication to keep him informed. The proviso to Article 239AA(4) allows the Lieutenant Governor to refer only substantial matters of national importance to the President, not every decision. Procedurally, differences must first be resolved through dialogue with the Minister and Council before escalation. The Court rejected a literal interpretation, adopting purposive reading to preserve democratic values and the cabinet system established by the 69th constitutional amendment while respecting the Union's legitimate national interests in governing the capital.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Union Territories Separation of Powers Cabinet Government Federalism Democratic Governance Administrative Law Delhi

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login