Breaking Constructive Criticism Essential for Democracy, but School Curricula Must Remain Fair and Verified: Supreme Court
New Delhi · Thursday, 01 October 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-08-09 allowed

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs Essar Power Limited

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

GUVNL, a power buyer, contracted with Essar Power Limited (EPL) for 300 MW of electricity from a 515 MW plant, with the balance (215 MW) allocated to Essar Steel Ltd. GUVNL claimed EPL wrongfully diverted power meant for it to Essar Steel. The Tribunal rejected the claim, finding no obligation to allocate proportionately. The Supreme Court held that the Power Purchase Agreement required EPL to declare total plant capacity and allocate supply in the contracted 58:42 ratio between the two beneficiaries. EPL's own letters admitting this obligation were binding. The Tribunal erred in ignoring the proportionate allocation principle and EPL's admissions. The Court allowed the appeal and restored the Regulatory Commission's order directing compensation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Law Power Purchase Agreements Contract Interpretation Generation Companies Tribunal Jurisdiction Access to Justice Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login