In Brief
This case involved the murder of a village Pradhan who was attacked by four accused with lathis and a spear. The trial court acquitted all accused, citing lack of independent witnesses, unproven place of occurrence, and unexplained injuries on one accused. The High Court reversed the acquittal, finding the trial court's reasoning perverse. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, holding that where eyewitness evidence is credible and reliable, non-examination of independent witnesses is not fatal to the prosecution case. The Court reaffirmed that appellate courts can reverse acquittals when trial court findings are perverse, contrary to evidence, or so irrational as to defy logic. Motive need not be established when credible eyewitness evidence exists, and injuries on the accused need not be mechanically explained if the prosecution evidence is strong and cogent.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.