Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-26 allowed

State of Madhya Pradesh vs Chhaakki Lal and Another

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

Four people, including a three-year-old child, were murdered in broad daylight on 20 February 2006. The sole eyewitness was Kesar Bai (PW-1), the grandmother and mother of three of the deceased. The trial court convicted the accused on her testimony, supported by ballistic and medical evidence, and imposed death penalty. The High Court reversed this, finding contradictions in PW-1's evidence. The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal, holding that while there were minor discrepancies in PW-1's testimony, they did not undermine her credibility or the prosecution's case. The Court emphasised that the quality of evidence matters more than quantity, and a single reliable witness can sustain conviction, especially when corroborated by expert evidence. The conviction was restored, but the death penalty was commuted to life imprisonment."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Eyewitness Testimony Murder Credibility of Witness Ballistic Evidence Medical Evidence Appeals Against Acquittal Indian Penal Code Section 302

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login