Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-06-15 allowed

Halke Ram & Anr vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by two men (Halke Ram and another) convicted by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. The High Court had reversed the trial court's acquittal. The Supreme Court held that appellate courts must be extremely cautious before interfering with acquittals, as the presumption of innocence is strengthened by such orders. The High Court failed to address the trial court's specific reasons for acquittal based on timing and distance evidence. Additionally, key eyewitnesses cited in the charge sheet were not examined, blood-stained clothes were not seized, and uncertainty existed about when the incident occurred. The Court acquitted the appellants and ordered their release.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Acquittal Eyewitness Evidence Presumption of Innocence Evidence Murder

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login