Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-01-20 partly_allowed

HARYANA SPACE APPLICATION CENTRE (HARSAC) & ANR vs M/S PAN INDIA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD

Bench: 3 — L. Nageswara Rao, Indu Malhotra, Ajay Rastogi

In Brief

HARSAC, a Government of Haryana agency, appointed a Principal Secretary as its nominee arbitrator in a dispute with Pan India Consultants over contract performance. After over 4 years without an award despite the tribunal expressing readiness to pronounce it, the High Court granted a further 4-month extension. The Supreme Court held the Principal Secretary's appointment void under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act 1996, as a government officer controlling a party entity cannot arbitrate. Rather than extend the invalid tribunal, the Court substituted it with a retired Supreme Court Judge as sole arbitrator to complete proceedings within 6 months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Conflict of Interest Arbitrator Eligibility Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Public Authority as Party Tribunal Mandate

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login