Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-27 allowed

Haryana Urban Development Authority & Ors vs Orchid Infrastructure Developers P. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed a suit by Orchid Infrastructure Developers seeking declaration that rejection of its highest auction bid (Rs. 111.75 crores) was illegal and seeking mandatory injunction for issuance of an allotment letter. The Court held that: (1) no vested right accrues to a bidder until formal acceptance and allotment letter issuance, so suit for mandatory injunction was not maintainable absent a concluded contract; (2) the Administrator had competent authority to reject the bid under delegation of powers and auction terms; (3) the rejection was not arbitrary—it was based on Auction Committee reports considering comparative market prices; and (4) the plaintiff should have paid ad valorem court fee on the bid amount. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the trial court's dismissal was restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Auction Administrative Law Judicial Review Public Law Civil Procedure Competent Authority

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login