Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-12 dismissed

High Court of Judicature at Patna vs Ajay Kumar Srivastava and others

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A judicial officer of the Bihar Higher Judicial Service challenged his compulsory retirement order. The High Court dismissed the retirement order, holding it was not sustainable. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment. While acknowledging serious allegations of misconduct against the officer, the Court held that any removal or retirement must follow due process of law. An officer cannot simply be sent home with retiral benefits; however, any retirement order must comply with procedural requirements rather than bypass them entirely. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision while permitting the employer to initiate formal disciplinary action if warranted.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Service Law Compulsory Retirement Judicial Conduct Due Process Disciplinary Action

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login