Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-01-11 allowed

High Court of Kerala vs Reshma A. & Others etc

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

The High Court of Kerala had approved appointments to judicial posts (Munsiff-Magistrates) beyond the notified vacancies, allowing vacant positions that arose during the next recruitment year to be filled from an earlier selection list. The Supreme Court held this violated constitutional principles. Vacancies notified for a given recruitment year must be filled from that year's select list only. Vacancies arising in a subsequent year cannot be allocated to an earlier selection, as this denies candidates in the later year their constitutional right to equal opportunity. The Court harmonised the Kerala Rules with its Malik Mazhar Sultan precedent requiring annual selections, holding that 'probable vacancies' extend only to anticipated gaps within that year, not future years. The appeals were allowed and the High Court's judgment set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Judicial Service Recruitment Statutory Rules Public Employment Constitutional Rights Articles 14 and 16 Selection Process Vacancies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login