In Brief
A couple married under Section 7A of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with advocates as witnesses sought enforcement of their marriage rights. The appellant appealed after the High Court dismissed his habeas corpus petition, criticizing the advocates' involvement. The Supreme Court held that Section 7A marriages do not require public declaration or solemnization for validity—only mutual consent and a symbolic ceremony suffice. Public declaration may endanger couples facing parental or community pressure. The Court overruled the High Court's erroneous interpretation and allowed the appeal, finding the woman's marriage was voluntary. Advocates may not solemnize marriages but may act as witnesses in their personal capacity.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.