Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-16 disposed

In Re : T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad and Ors vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta

In Brief

The Supreme Court considered whether the State of Himachal Pradesh could carry out limited silviculture felling in forests despite an earlier blanket ban. The Court found that controlled felling was necessary for proper forest regeneration and could be permitted experimentally. It approved silviculture operations in three specific forest types (Chil, Sal, Khair) below 1500m elevation, with strict conditions: compartments limited to 20 hectares annually, retention of mother trees, direct execution by state agencies only, detailed video monitoring, immediate re-afforestation, expert committee supervision, and biannual reporting to ensure the felling actually aided regeneration."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Environmental Law Forest Conservation Wildlife Protection Administrative Law Writ Petition

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login