Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-16 disposed

In Re : T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad and Ors vs Union of India (UOI) and Ors

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta

In Brief

The Supreme Court considered Himachal Pradesh's request to resume silviculture felling operations after a 22-year ban on tree cutting imposed for forest protection. The Court balanced conservation with ecological necessity: while maintaining the protective ban, it permitted limited experimental silviculture felling on a pilot basis, restricted to three specific forest types below 1500 metres elevation. Strict conditions apply: compartments capped at 20 hectares annually, retention of significant mature trees as seed sources, direct execution by government agencies, videographic documentation, mandatory replanting, and expert committee oversight with six-monthly reports. The Court modified its earlier orders solely to this extent, allowing careful assessment of whether controlled felling promotes or hinders forest regeneration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Environmental Law Forest Conservation Wildlife Protection Administrative Law Environmental Monitoring Silviculture Interlocutory Application

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login