Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-12-03 dismissed

INDERJIT SINGH SODHI AND OTHERS vs THE CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANOTHER

Bench: 3 — L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, Ajay Rastogi

In Brief

Promoted Assistant Engineers at Punjab State Electricity Board challenged denial of time-bound promotional scales (applicable after 9/16 years of service) granted to directly recruited officers junior to them. The Supreme Court held that promoted officers cannot claim parity with direct recruits lacking equivalent qualifications. The Second Circular (1990) applies only to direct recruits and A.M.I.E.-qualified promotees reserved under quota. Diploma-holding promotees are governed by the First Circular, which grants time-bound scales only if not promoted within 9/16 years. Constitutional equality (Articles 14, 16) permits differential treatment based on qualification distinctions. Appeals dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Service Regulations Employee Promotion Parity in Pay and Promotion Public Sector Employment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login