Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-05-04 allowed

Jage Ram (D) Thr. Lrs vs Union of India & Anr

Bench: 3 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed whether sale deeds should be used as evidence to determine land compensation when land is acquired for public purposes. Appellants owned 13.7 bighas acquired for a Sub-Divisional Office construction in Delhi in 1973 and sought enhanced compensation. The Court held that while the appellants' sale deed (Rs. 7,000/- per bigha) could not be relied upon due to lack of evidence showing similarity with the acquired land, the respondents' sale deed from the same village showing Rs. 2,000/- per bigha was appropriately considered. Applying 15% annual escalation from 1971 to 1973, the Court enhanced compensation to Rs. 2,600/- per bigha, allowing the appeal.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Evidence Property Valuation Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login