In Brief
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against journalists and editors accused of defamation by an auction house. The Court held that specific allegations, not blanket statements, are required to hold media personnel liable for defamatory content. It ruled that the Magistrate failed to follow mandatory procedures under Section 202 Cr.P.C. by not conducting an inquiry before summoning defendants residing outside jurisdiction. The Court also found that reporting on expert opinions and controversies regarding artwork authenticity, without definitive conclusions, does not constitute defamation. While affirming the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression, the Court emphasized that media must exercise responsibility and publish in good faith and public interest.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.