Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-07 dismissed

Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (Jal) Through its Director vs Tehri Hydro Development Corporation India Ltd. (THDC) Through its Director

Bench: 3 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

Jaiprakash Associates, a contractor, was awarded compensation by an arbitral tribunal for certain disputed claims but challenged the High Court's decision to quash the interest (at 10% p.a.) awarded by the arbitrators. The contract contained clauses 50 and 51 of the General Conditions of Contract that expressly barred payment of interest on money due to the contractor. The Supreme Court held that under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arbitrators cannot award interest when the contract contains an express bar. The Court distinguished earlier judgments under the 1940 Act and confirmed that clauses 50 and 51 constitute an absolute prohibition on interest, making the arbitrators' award of interest without jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's decision.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Contract Interpretation Award of Interest General Conditions of Contract

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login