Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-11-18 allowed

Union of India vs Manraj Enterprises

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

In Brief

A contractor engaged with the Indian Railways under a contract containing a General Conditions of Contract clause 16(2) that expressly barred payment of interest on amounts due under the contract. The arbitrator awarded pendente lite and future interest, which was upheld by the High Court. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that where a contract expressly prohibits interest on amounts payable to the contractor, the arbitrator cannot award pendente lite or future interest, as arbitrators are bound by the express terms of the contract. Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration Act, 1996 makes an arbitrator's power to award interest subject to the parties' agreement.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration and Conciliation Contract Law Interest - Award by Arbitrator General Conditions of Contract Interpretation of Contracts Ejusdem Generis

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login