Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-05-13 allowed

Jatin C. Jhaveri vs Union of India

Bench: 2 — Uday U. Lalit

In Brief

A diamond trader, Jatin Jhaveri, and associates attempted to transport US currency out of India. Initial Customs proceedings found the currency liable to confiscation. Later, FERA proceedings challenged the acquisition itself under Section 8(1), requiring prior RBI permission. The Appellate Tribunal and High Court quashed confiscation, relying on Currency Declaration Forms and decisions in parallel Customs proceedings. The Supreme Court held that FERA proceedings require independent proof of acquisition with RBI permission—a distinct requirement from merely proving currency importation. As no RBI permission was ever obtained, the acquisition violated Section 8(1) of FERA. The Court restored the confiscation and directed refund of interim relief with 10% interest.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Customs Law Foreign Exchange Regulation Confiscation Currency Control Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login