Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-26 allowed

JOSEPH EASWARAN WAPSHARE vs SHIRLEY KATHELEEN WHEELER

Bench: 2 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, Vineet Saran

In Brief

Gorden Wapshare died intestate in 1991, and a Succession Certificate was granted to his son, the appellant, in 2005. The respondent, Shirley Katheleen Wheeler—a British citizen and daughter of Beatrice (who married Edward Wapshare, Gorden's brother, as a second wife)—applied in 2005 to revoke the certificate. The Sub-Court dismissed the application, holding that the respondent was an outsider without standing and that res judicata barred the claim. The High Court set aside the dismissal only on the res judicata ground and remanded. The Supreme Court held that the respondent had no lineal descent or family connection to the Wapshare family and thus lacked standing to challenge the certificate. None of the statutory grounds for revocation under Section 383 were made out. The Court set aside the High Court's remand and restored the Sub-Judge's dismissal, upholding the Succession Certificate."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Succession Law Succession Certificate Revocation of Certificate Lineal Descent Standing and Locus Standi Intestate Succession

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login