Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-03-23 disposed

Bench: 3 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

In Brief

The Supreme Court Bar Association sought a writ of mandamus under Article 32 to direct the conversion of 1.33 acres of land allotted to the Supreme Court into chambers for lawyers, and to redesignate surrounding institutional areas as a Supreme Court Complex. The Court held that matters involving change of land use, allocation of resources among stakeholders (lawyers, litigants, and court staff), and institutional management cannot be resolved through judicial intervention. Such administrative issues must be addressed on the Supreme Court's administrative side through consultation with the Bar, rather than through judicial directions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Judicial Institutions Advocates Act Institutional Management Separation of Judicial and Administrative Functions Land Use

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login