Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Thursday, 29 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-27

Just Society vs Union of India

Bench: 2 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

Just Society challenged the constitutionality of several provisions of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, arguing that the Selection Committee provisions violate Articles 14 and 50 by not conferring primacy to the Chief Justice of India's opinion and by failing to prescribe norms for appointing an 'eminent jurist'. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, holding that the legislature has discretionary power to decide whether to accord primacy to the Chief Justice in appointment matters. The absence of such primacy does not render the Act unconstitutional, nor does the lack of exhaustive norms for selecting an eminent jurist, when the decision rests with a high-powered body of senior constitutional functionaries.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act Administrative Law Judicial Appointments Separation of Powers

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login