Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-11-01 allowed

K. Lakshmanya & Company vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

This case concerns whether a partnership firm assessee is entitled to interest under Section 244(A) of the Income-Tax Act on refund that arises when the Settlement Commission waives interest under Sections 234(A)-(C). The High Court held that since waiver was discretionary, no legal right to claim interest on the refunded amount arose. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that once the Settlement Commission exercises its discretionary power to waive interest (pursuant to a CBDT circular), a concomitant statutory right automatically springs into being in the assessee's favour. Interest on refund is a non-discretionary statutory obligation once refund becomes due. The Court approved prior precedent that 'amount' in the refund provisions encompasses interest, making the assessee's right to interest parasitical to the refund itself.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Taxation Refund Interest on Refund Settlement Commission Income Tax Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login