Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-10-07 allowed

K. S. SHIVAPPA vs SMT. K. NEELAMMA

Bench: 2 — Pankaj Mithal, Prasanna B. Varale

In Brief

K.S. Shivappa purchased two adjoining plots (Nos. 56 and 57) that were originally owned by minors. The minors' father, as their natural guardian, sold both plots to third parties without court permission—required by Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. Upon attaining majority, the surviving minors repudiated the voidable sales by selling both properties to Shivappa, who then occupied the land. A subsequent purchaser of plot No. 57, Smt. K. Neelamma, sued for possession. The Supreme Court held that minors need not file a formal suit to avoid a voidable transaction; repudiation through conduct—such as selling the property to another—within the limitation period suffices. Since the minors had repudiated the sale, no valid title passed to subsequent purchasers. The judgment was allowed and the trial court's decision in Shivappa's favour was restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Minors—Guardianship Voidable Transactions Immovable Property—Transfer Repudiation of Contract Evidence—Testimony of Power-of-Attorney Holder Title to Property Judicial Permissions—Guardians Limitation Period

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login