Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-10-27 partly_allowed

K.V. ANIL MITHRA & ANR vs SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT & ANR

Bench: 2 — Ajay Rastogi, Abhay S. Oka

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that daily-wage workers employed by the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit for over 240 days were entitled to protection under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, despite their irregular appointment procedures. Their termination without notice and compensation as mandated by Section 25F was illegal and void. Although the Tribunal had awarded reinstatement with 50% back wages, the Court modified the relief to a lump-sum monetary compensation of Rs. 2.5 lakh per worker, finding such compensation more practical for daily-wagers who have no right to regularization or continued service post-reinstatement. The Court reaffirmed that the applicability of Section 25F depends on workman status and continuous service, not appointment regularity.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Industrial Law Labour Law Retrenchment Section 25F Daily Wage Workers Statutory Procedures Compensation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login