Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-11-26 partly_allowed

KALI CHARAN AND OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, Sandeep Mehta

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld land acquisition proceedings for the integrated development of the Yamuna Expressway and adjoining areas in Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. Though covering 12,868 landowners, only 140 challenged the acquisition. The Court held that invoking urgency provisions under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 to dispense with public objection hearings was legally justified, as the expressway and adjoining residential, commercial, and recreational development form one inseparable project serving public interest. A High Court judgment validating the acquisition with 64.7% enhanced compensation was upheld; a conflicting judgment quashing it was overruled as overlooking binding precedent. The Court dismissed landowner appeals but allowed developer appeals.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Administrative Law Public Interest Infrastructure Development

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login