Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-09-20 allowed

M/s. ULTRA-TECH CEMENT LTD vs MAST RAM & ORS

Bench: 2 — J. B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra

In Brief

Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd acquired a cement project from Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) in 2017 through a Scheme of Arrangement. Land for a safety zone around the cement plant had been acquired by the State in 2008, and after award of compensation in 2018, a supplementary award of over 3 crores was passed in 2022 for additional compensation owed to landowners. The High Court directed Ultra-Tech to pay; Ultra-Tech appealed, arguing liability remained with JAL under the Scheme. The Supreme Court held that since acquisition proceedings commenced before the scheme's effective date and compensation remained undetermined then, liability stayed with JAL under the scheme's explicit terms. However, the Court held the State of Himachal Pradesh, as a welfare state, could not avoid its constitutional duty under Article 300-A to ensure prompt payment of determined compensation after taking possession. The Court directed the State to pay the landowners immediately and recover the amount from JAL, as ultimate acquisition cost liability fell on JAL.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Constitutional Law Corporate Restructuring Compensation Welfare State Eminent Domain Property Rights Scheme of Arrangement

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login