Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-03-03 partly_allowed

KARAN @ FATIYA vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Bench: 3 — B.R. Gavai, Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol

In Brief

A 15-year-old boy was convicted of murder, rape, and related offences and sentenced to death. He later claimed juvenility on appeal. The Supreme Court held that the boy was indeed 15 years 4 months 20 days old on the offence date, making him a child under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The Court upheld the conviction but set aside the sentence. It held that once a child is identified, the maximum sentence is 3 years. Since he had already served over 5 years, the Court ordered his immediate release. The judgment clarified that finding juvenility does not vitiate conviction; it only affects sentencing and requires compliance with child welfare provisions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Juvenile Justice Criminal Law Child Rights Age Determination Death Sentence Heinous Offences Sentencing

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login