In Brief
The appellant was convicted of dowry death (Section 304-B) and cruelty (Section 498-A) after his wife's suicide by hanging. The Supreme Court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of dowry death: specifically, there was no credible evidence of cruelty or harassment soon before her death. Significant omissions and contradictions in witness statements, statements recorded months after the incident as apparent afterthoughts, and vague allegations without specific instances defeated the charges. The Court emphasized that the statutory presumption under Section 113-B cannot apply without first proving these foundational facts, and mere moral conviction is insufficient for conviction.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.