In Brief
This interlocutory order in a writ petition concerns the constitutional balance between the right to freedom of speech and expression (Article 19(1)(a)) and the right to life and liberty (Article 21). The petitioner challenges restrictions on speech, raising the question whether Article 19(1)(a) is controlled solely by Article 19(2) or whether Article 21 also impacts its scope. The Court appointed senior counsel as amicus curiae to assist in developing the legal framework for balancing these competing fundamental rights. The matter was adjourned for final hearing after the amicus requested time to formulate detailed propositions."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.