Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-17 dismissed

Kerala Assistant Public Prosecutors Association vs State of Kerala and Ors

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

The Kerala Assistant Public Prosecutors Association sought parity with Public Prosecutors regarding retirement age, claiming both perform similar duties. The Association argued that Assistant Public Prosecutors appointed before 31 March 2013 should have a retirement age of 60 years instead of 56. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that although both positions have similar functions, they differ fundamentally in method of appointment and service conditions. Public Prosecutors are appointed from an advocate panel for fixed 3-year terms without government employee benefits, while Assistant Public Prosecutors are civil servants appointed through competitive examination with full statutory pension rights. The Court found no infirmity in the High Court's reasoning and held that service conditions are a matter of government policy, while inviting the Association to make representations to the State Government.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Administrative Law Public Service Service Conditions Retirement Age Parity Constitutional Law Statutory Pension Scheme

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login