Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-11-20 allowed

Khodiyaar Rolling Mills vs Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd

Bench: 1 — Banumathi

In Brief

An electricity distributor obtained an ex-parte decree for Rs.63.4 lakhs against a mill owner after the mill owner failed to appear. The mill owner sought to set aside the decree under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC more than twenty months later. The trial court and High Court rejected the application, finding the delay unexplained. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, noting the mill owner's bona fides in depositing Rs.70 lakhs as directed by interim order. The Court set aside the ex-parte decree and restored the suit for decision on merits, with the deposit remaining subject to the final outcome."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Decree Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Ex-parte Decree

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login