Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-03-28 disposed

Krishnakant Tamrakar vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

A man convicted of murder under the IPC languished in custody for over ten years awaiting appeal hearing in the High Court. While the Supreme Court declined to grant bail, it used the case to address systemic judicial delays. The Court held that speedy justice is a fundamental right under Articles 14 and 21. Finding existing High Court structures incapable of timely disposal, the Court directed the government to examine creating alternative appellate forums below High Courts to reduce congestion, implementing central recruitment mechanisms for judges, establishing performance accountability, and preventing lawyer strikes that obstruct justice. The matter was disposed with orders for quarterly reports and future consideration.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail Right to Speedy Trial Judicial Administration Court Congestion Judicial Reform

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login